Skip to content
Call us on: 01604 60 95 60 X Icon
GET IN TOUCH

Get in touch

In need of legal advice? Leave us a message, we’d love to hear from you!




    X Close

    Can a Serious Breach of Contract Be Fixed?

    PLEASE NOTE: Information in this article is correct at the time of publication, please contact DFA Law for current advice on older articles.

    Can a Serious Breach of Contract Be Fixed? The Court of Appeal Says Yes — Sometimes

    A recent Court of Appeal decision has caused quite a stir in contract law circles, confirming that even a repudiatory breach (one of the most serious kinds of contract breaches) can, in certain circumstances, be capable of remedy.

    In Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1206 (26 September 2025), the Court looked at what happens when one party seriously breaches a shareholders’ agreement (SHA), and whether that breach can still be “put right” afterwards.

    What Happened?

    Rohit Kulkarni (the appellant) entered into a SHA with Gwent Holdings Limited and St Joseph’s Independent Hospital Limited back in 2020. Gwent later admitted to a series of serious breaches, including allotting itself shares that should have gone to Mr Kulkarni, and even trying to terminate the agreement.

    These breaches were accepted as material and repudiatory; the kind that usually allows the innocent party to walk away from the contract altogether.

    Mr Kulkarni argued that once a repudiatory breach has happened it can’t be remedied, which has long been the standard legal position.

    The Court’s Take

    The Court of Appeal didn’t agree.

    They looked carefully at the SHA’s transfer of shares clause, which said that if a shareholder committed a material or persistent breach that was capable of remedy, they had ten business days to fix it once notified.

    Crucially, the clause didn’t say that a repudiatory breach was automatically irremediable. The Court said that if the parties had wanted that to be the case, they should have made it clear in the contract.

    The judges took what they called a “practical rather than technical” approach — meaning that whether a breach can be remedied depends on what’s actually possible in the real world, not just on strict legal theory.

    Why This Matters for Business Owners

    This case is a timely reminder that the detail in your contracts really matters. Even a serious breach might not have the effect you think it does, depending on how the agreement is worded.

    If you’re involved in a shareholders’ agreement, partnership, or joint venture, it’s worth checking that your documents clearly spell out what happens when things go wrong — especially when it comes to breaches and remedies.

    Need help reviewing or updating your shareholders’ agreement? Contact Kirsty Simmonds, Partner in the Corporate & Commercial Team at DFA Law LLP, for clear, practical advice tailored to your business.

    Back To Top
    Search