DFA LAW LLP Solicitors

Owner Not the Same as Member, Rules Court

Jo Harrison — Mon, 13 May 2013 10:36:07 +0000

Who can challenge a company’s decision that has been improperly made? This question was the subject of a court hearing recently, when the owners of the ‘ultimate economic interest’ in shares in a company sought to overturn a decision the … Continue reading →

The post Owner Not the Same as Member, Rules Court appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Forged Planning Certificates Mean Prison

Jo Harrison — Mon, 13 May 2013 10:26:37 +0000

A man who sold a house after forging certificates for planning permission for works he had carried out but for which planning permission had not been obtained was recently sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment. The man had applied on three … Continue reading →

The post Forged Planning Certificates Mean Prison appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Court Backs Lord of Manor Over Land But Not Title

Jo Harrison — Fri, 10 May 2013 16:20:07 +0000

A recent High Court case provided a lesson in medieval land law for those involved, and featured a reputed Lord of the Manor in dispute with his villagers. In 2000, Peter Burton, a retired banker, and his partner Susan Bamford … Continue reading →

The post Court Backs Lord of Manor Over Land But Not Title appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Fair Comment Still Comes at a Cost

Jo Harrison — Fri, 10 May 2013 16:18:14 +0000

When a businessman voiced his opinion on planning matters by joining a planning action group which opposed the construction of two biomass power plants, he did not expect his past business record to become the subject of debate. However, a … Continue reading →

The post Fair Comment Still Comes at a Cost appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

ECHR Rules on Religious Discrimination Claims

Jo Harrison — Fri, 10 May 2013 16:14:15 +0000

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has handed down its rulings in four domestic cases in which Christian employees claimed to have suffered discrimination at work on account of their religious beliefs (Eweida and Others v United Kingdom). The … Continue reading →

The post ECHR Rules on Religious Discrimination Claims appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Architects Fined for Asbestos Failure

Jo Harrison — Wed, 08 May 2013 14:10:02 +0000

The Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012 [1] came into force on 6 April 2012. These made some adjustments to the existing Regulations, in order to take account of the European Commission’s view that the UK had not fully implemented the … Continue reading →

The post Architects Fined for Asbestos Failure appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Government Amends ‘Whistleblowing’ Legislation

Jo Harrison — Wed, 08 May 2013 14:01:51 +0000

Under Section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, a worker has the right not to be subjected to unwanted treatment amounting to a detriment by their employer because the worker has made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest … Continue reading →

The post Government Amends ‘Whistleblowing’ Legislation appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Woman Scarred in Boat Accident Wins £55,000

Jo Harrison — Wed, 08 May 2013 13:56:28 +0000

A woman who injured her face when she crashed into a stanchion on a boat during a river trip has been awarded £55,000 in damages. In April 2008, Sinead McGlinchey, 23, was attending a surprise barbeque party, with four other … Continue reading →

The post Woman Scarred in Boat Accident Wins £55,000 appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Property Sale on Forged Document Was Void

Jo Harrison — Wed, 08 May 2013 13:53:20 +0000

A businessman who had an £850,000 London property sold from under him by a forger whilst he languished in prison in the Middle East has been handed the property back by a judge. The High Court ruled that the purported … Continue reading →

The post Property Sale on Forged Document Was Void appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.

Unreasonable redundancy selection procedures

John Keeble — Fri, 03 May 2013 09:33:33 +0000

An EAT decision provides a reminder to all employers that any departure from the conventional approach to selection criteria during a redundancy exercise must be treated with caution. The EAT found that an employer had acted unreasonably when it used … Continue reading →

The post Unreasonable redundancy selection procedures appeared first on DFA LAW LLP Solicitors.